Case Study of Alex-Free-Sample for Students-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss the Case Study of Alex. Answer: Introduction of the case The analysis is based on case study of Alex who has been working in the IT field for the last 10 years. He has been performing different roles including IT Manager, Business Analyst and Programmer. Alex has recently joined Initech Corp. in the post of the Production Manager of the company. The company already has an IT Manager who manages the network infrastructure and the server of the company. However, the employees are not happy with the working process of the IT Manager. The directors of the company are strict about the privacy issues of the company. The IT Manager has therefore imposed many rules regarding the use of the computer systems of the company on the programmers. The point of view of Paul is that the restrictions are necessary to prevent wrong usage of the systems against the interest of the company (Burmeister et al. 2014). The ethical, professional and legal issues related to the case The issues related to this case study are that the IT Manager of the company has restricted the employees from performing their own duties and restricted them from the usage of their own computers. The confidentiality agreements are signed by the employees of the organization before they join, hence the issue related to trust on the employees is hampered by the activities of the IT Manager (Clarke 2016). Ethical issues in the case related to the ACS Code of Ethics The decision of the CEO does not correspond with the following values as stated by the ACS Code of Ethics (Acs.org.au 2017), The Enhancement of Quality of Life - The company has violated this code of ethics as they are not trying to enhance the quality of life of the employees in the organization. The work of the programmers has been made more complex and this hampers their personal lives as well. Honesty The company does not trust the integrity and honesty of the programmers even after their agreement with the organization before joining it. Professional Development The company does not strive for professional development of its staff. The reason is that the company is providing hindrance in the work of the employees by not giving them any independence regarding their work process and thereby restricting them from achieving their goals (Ferguson, Thornley and Gibb 2016). Issues related to the Code of Professional conduct stated by ACS According to the Code of Professional Conduct as stated by ACS, in relation to the above stated values considered by the organization, the following points related to Information and Communications Technology (ICT) are applicable (Acs.org.au 2017), Code violated 1.2.2(c) The company is not trying to align their policies with the perceptions and the likes of the employees working for them and providing hindrance in their work process. Code violated 1.2.2(d) The company is not taking any steps regarding the improvement of the job satisfaction of the employees, their ability to achieve the goals and the way they control the process of work. Code violated 1.2.5(c) The company is not following this principle and not taking any actions regarding the motivation and encouragement of the employees. On the contrary, the restrictions that were imposed on the programmers was hampering their work process. Code violated 1.2.5(d) The organization is therefore not supporting the professional development of the employees and is not aware of the different needs of the employees. Code violated 1.2.6(c) The company is not taking any steps regarding the opportunities that are provided to employees based on their skills and they are prevented from achieving their goals and work in an independent manner. Recommendations related to the case study The recommendation related to this case study is that Alex should consult the management of the company regarding the issues of the programmers. The steps taken by Paul have restricted the work process of the employees and this can further lead unethical steps taken by the employees to protect their own interests. This can be said as the employees have already taken such steps like uploading and downloading the source codes. This can be prevented by allowing the employees access to their own computers and giving them freedom to work. The activities of the employees however need to be checked to protect the interest of the company. References Acs.org.au (2017).Search Results. [online] Acs.org.au. Available at: https://www.acs.org.au/search.html?q=ACS+CODE+OF+PROFESSIONAL+CONDUCT [Accessed 29 Nov. 2017]. Burmeister, O., Al-Saggaf, Y., Schwartz, M. and Johnson, L., 2014. Internet resources to help Australian ICT professionals identify and solve ethical challenges. ACIS. Clarke, R., 2016. Big data, big risks.Information Systems Journal,26(1), pp.77-90. Ferguson, S., Thornley, C. and Gibb, F., 2016. Beyond codes of ethics: how library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment.International Journal of Information Management,36(4), pp.543-556.